RE: [lawvoyage] Acquisitions - ordering

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
Bernice Polvi (Bernice.Polvi@just.gov.ab.ca)
Tue, 13 May 2003 10:53:45 -0600



Message-Id: <03May13.105334mdt.119063@gateway.just.gov.ab.ca>
Date:  Tue, 13 May 2003 10:53:45 -0600
From: "Bernice Polvi" <Bernice.Polvi@just.gov.ab.ca>
Subject: RE: [lawvoyage] Acquisitions - ordering

Hi Carol - I looked for you at EndUsers this year to thank you for all the help you've given me with previous questions, but never saw you - did you attend? Of course I don't know what you look like, so that was a problem. I also inquired about a list of attendees so I could try to locate people who have helped but they don't publish a list of delegates.

I haven't had a response back on the loose-leaf question - I suspect we will enter a unique code in the note field of the po and see how that works for us. If I do hear anything back I will let you know.

I played in the training database a bit this morning trying to get the order information to show when ordering something that is already in the catalogue - i.e. the STO issue - ordering the 2003 edition of an annotated act. I tried not linking to the existing mfhd, and having the system create a new mfhd (planning to suppress it), but the system linked to the existing mfhd anyway - which is not what the manual says it will do. We figure if wee need the info displayed in the opac, the only way to do so for these items is to manually add a z (public note) to the 852.

When you suppress the mfhds, you cannot tell in Cataloguing which mfhds are suppressed - do you find that you end up with a large number of suppressed mfhds and that it becomes hard to distinguish between suppressed
 and active?

Bernice

>>> CKlink@uwyo.edu 05/13/03 09:41AM >>>
Bernice: Let me know about the last one about the Looseleafs.

Yes we usually order STO when we can with one PO and 1 MFHD. However we do suppress MFHDS when they have PO's attached. We complete the PO's but don't delete unless there is no payment info attached. You can relink the component with a new PO and you don't lose the history that way. However, most STO's we don't show in the OPAC since they don't follow the usual prediction if any, and don't get bound. Perhaps some of the larger law libraries have an answer for you. Good luck. Voyager is not the ideal system for law libraries. Carol A. Klink Head of Technical Services University of Wyoming College of Law Library P.O. Box 3035 Laramie, WY 80271-3035
(307)766-5731
(307)766-4044 (fax)

-----Original Message----- From: Bernice Polvi [mailto:Bernice.Polvi@just.gov.ab.ca] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 9:05 AM To: lawvoyage@law.pepperdine.edu Subject: [lawvoyage] Acquisitions - ordering

I have been puzzling about this process, and hope someone has some insights for me.

We are beginning to place orders in Acquisitions. As a law library we typically have annuals that could be on standing order, but because of fiscal considerations aren't - we order them once every 2 years or so. Now, according to the documentation the presence of a call number in the mfhd turns off the display of order status in the opac. So....if you let the system create a new mfhd, you then have 2 mfhds. When the item arrives you link the item record to the appropriate mfhd and modify the holdings, etc. What happens with the mfhd that is linked to the po? You can't delete it because it is linked to the po - or do you complete the po? I am sure I read somewhere that completing the po severs the link and you can do whatever you want with the mfhd, etc. (right/wrong?). Or do you suppress the mfhd linked to the po and as this process continues do you then have many suppressed mfhds in the database? How do you enter the year on the order so that it displays in the opac? If anyone is willing to share their procedures I would be very grateful.

We are also looking to cancel many loose-leaf subscriptions and go to annual one-time purchases - does anyone have any suggestions on how to identify items to generate a report of titles that should be ordered annually? I was thinking of entering a code into the note area of the PO as it can be searched, and therefore a report generated, but is there a better option?

Thanks.

Bernice

************************************************* Bernice Polvi Head, Technology & Technical Services Law Society Libraries 1A Sir Winston Churchill Square Edmonton, AB Canada T5J 0R2 Telephone: (780) 415-8576 Fax: (780) 427-0397 Email: bernice.polvi@gov.ab.ca

************************************************* The information transmitted is intended only for the person addressed. Any unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy this message and any copies.
        

------------------------------------------------------------ LawVoyage is an email list for the Voyager Law User's Group Archives: http://lawmail.pepperdine.edu/lawvoyage/

To join or leave the list, send a message to
   lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu with the message 'subscribe' or 'unsubscribe'
------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------ LawVoyage is an email list for the Voyager Law User's Group Archives: http://lawmail.pepperdine.edu/lawvoyage/

To join or leave the list, send a message to
   lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu with the message 'subscribe' or 'unsubscribe'
------------------------------------------------------------



New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
This archive was generated on Tue May 13 2003 - 09:54:12 Pacific Daylight Time