Subject: RE: [lawvoyage] Complex Prediction Pattern unstable Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:28:23 -0600 Message-ID: <99F75197933F664596A5BA9891F3F867925DF3@quoll.law.uiuc.edu> From: "Henigman, Barbara" <henigman@law.uiuc.edu>
It is a problem if there is history. We've developed a funky code we
put into pattern names when we can't delete them and don't want anyone
to use them. Sigh. -- BH
**************************************
Barb Henigman
Head of Technical Services
Albert E. Jenner Memorial Law Library
142 Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: (217) 244-3047
Fax: (217) 244-8500
henigman@law.uiuc.edu
________________________________
From: lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu
[mailto:lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu] On Behalf Of Andrea Rabbia
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:20 AM
To: lawvoyage@law.pepperdine.edu
Subject: RE: [lawvoyage] Complex Prediction Pattern unstable
Thanks Barbara. It does help knowing I can go to a far extreme to
delete the component and start over. However, in many cases I would
have to sacrifice close to 10 years of receipt history in Voyager if I
deleted and started over; I am not sure it's worth it just to get rid of
a wrong CPP...
Thanks,
Andrea
>>> "Henigman, Barbara" <henigman@law.uiuc.edu> 1/26/2007 9:52 AM >>>
Hi Andrea,
I have noticed this as well. I have come to the conclusion that even
though a pattern is closed the component still remains attached. If I
am creating a pattern and want to redo it before there is any history, I
will delete the entire component and start over. This seems to make it
detach completely and then I can delete the pattern with the mistake.
Hope this helps,
Barb
**************************************
Barb Henigman
Head of Technical Services
Albert E. Jenner Memorial Law Library
142 Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: (217) 244-3047
Fax: (217) 244-8500
henigman@law.uiuc.edu
________________________________
From: lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu
[mailto:lawvoyage-request@law.pepperdine.edu] On Behalf Of Andrea Rabbia
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:17 PM
To: lawvoyage@law.pepperdine.edu
Subject: [lawvoyage] Complex Prediction Pattern unstable
Hello fellow Law Voyager Users,
I was wondering if anyone else was having trouble with Complex
Prediction Patterns (CPP). Here is a recurring problem that I have
encountered:
1. I create a new CPP, e.g. three nos. a yr. (3) IAS: no(R) mo yr CP
(this is our weird naming convention for 3x/yr. with a label before no.
mo. yr. of Interim Annotation Service, where no. restarts each year)
2. I assign it to a component, e.g. Michigan Compiled Laws, interim
annotation service
3. I notice I forgot to add the number (no.) element to the pattern -
so it's really just three nos. a yr. (3) IAS: month year CPP
4. So I close the pattern for this component and return to the New CPP
area
5. This time I really do create a new CPP with three nos. a yr. (3)
IAS: no(R) mo yr CP
6. I assign it to a component, e.g. Michigan Compiled Laws, interim
annotation service, and it works beautifully
7. I try to delete the first instance of three nos. a yr. (3) IAS:
no(R) mo yr CP but it says it is still attached to the Michigan Compiled
Laws, interim annotation service - which it is not, because I closed the
pattern in step 4.
8. I rename it, and try again to delete it, but it still says that
Michigan Compiled Laws, interim annotation service is an Attached
Publication
This is the fourth time I have had this happen. Has anyone else noticed
this?
Andrea
Got Questions? Ask a Librarian.
Andrea Rabbia
Technical Services Librarian
H. Douglas Barclay Law Library
Syracuse University College of Law
E.I. White Hall
Syracuse, New York 13244-1030
315-443-9562
315-443-9567 (fax)
arrabbia@law.syr.edu
"There is a Book worth all other books which were ever printed."
Patrick Henry